Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

Cette page du projet dans d’autres langues :

Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"

Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.

Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer

Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
- La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
- Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
- "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :

Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

{{Pour}} ( Support),
{{Contre}} ( Oppose),

Ainsi que :

{{Neutre}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info),
{{Question}} ( Question).

IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} (

Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} (

Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles[edit]

Règles générales[edit]

Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10^e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5^e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
Au moins sept votes "pour".
un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} ( Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} ( Delist : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :

Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Carnival in Malta.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 08:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Bellina 09 - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Nice but quite small. I would support with a larger version. Yann (talk) 09:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The photographer has recently been active in Commons, I asked a question about this in the discussion page. -- IamMM (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Meat burek (GAK bakery, Belgrade, Serbia).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 08:48:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
Info Meat burek. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 08:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral what is feature here? --Ezarateesteban 11:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gray catbird (85315).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 01:26:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)
Info Gray catbird (Dumatella carolinensis), member of the mockingbird family. I like the light of this shot, and that you can clearly see the "secret" reddish feathers under the tail. :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Love its sharpness! --SHB2000 (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Check the eye. Sharpening effects. --Mile (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Familiar bluet with prey (61233).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2022 at 01:10:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Coenagrionidae_(Narrow-winged_Damselflies)
Info Familiar bluet (Enallagma civile) with prey (possibly a mosquito). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Cool shot. --Mile (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Beautiful. – Is there a small blue halo on the top border of the leftmost part of the bluet’s body? --Aristeas (talk) 08:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Brass instruments, Tuba, part of.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2022 at 18:01:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Musical instruments
Info For those who love minimalist shots. c/u/n by --Kreuz schnabel 18:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain as author --Kreuz schnabel 18:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral The photographed is reflected in the instrument, and anything is in focus? --Ezarateesteban 22:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral It's a good photo and I quite like it, but where's the wow? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral The artist is present. --Mile (talk) 08:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment IMHO the composition is not minimalist (too many elements without clear geometrical relation), and I have to confess that I understand neither the composition nor the placement of the plane of focus. --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FCAB GT22CU-3 2405, GT22CU-3 2401, GL26C-2 2005 Cumbre - Pampa.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2022 at 11:40:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 22:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Garranos fight.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2022 at 10:34:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
Info created and uploaded by Norbertoe - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Amazing. Such a beautiful shot. Looks like it's from another world. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Yes, it’s amazing. Pity it’s oversharpened as well. --Kreuz schnabel 12:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Great shot. Gyrostat (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support per Kreuzschnabel & Satdeep Gill -- Wolf im Wald 22:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This wouldn't have been an easy take. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Compelling image and composition, and quality is good enough IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support But the image very sharpened, and why the horses fighting. Maanshen (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support Amazing photo, it’s just a pity that the plants and rocks at the bottom are quite oversharpened. --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dampremy - Soumonces 2014 - 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 14:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by -- H₂O^(talk) 14:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. -- H₂O^(talk) 14:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment A little bit too dark? What do you think? IMO sharpness could be better too. --XRay 💬 07:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose crop too tight. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Tight crop, too dark, busy background, centered faces (too much space on top). --Kreuz schnabel 12:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Liège - palais des princes-évêques - armoiries de Georges-Louis de Berghes - 2021-09-16 - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 14:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by -- H₂O^(talk) 14:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. -- H₂O^(talk) 14:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Nice motif. Is a slight increase in sharpness possible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose not very sharp, imo. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Harsh light. And I'm missing something special here to consider this image as one of our best in the site -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rue des Marchands in Colmar 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 13:51:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose There's a little bit of purple CA near a TV antenna (I think that is) on the right, but the main issue to me is that this scene with dull gray skies is just not compelling. Your other nominee is much more appealing to me and I might vote for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Dull light and gray sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rua Conselheiro Lopes da Silva in Valenca (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 13:49:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Love the atmosphere! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per SHB2000. I wonder whether it could/should a bit darker, given the date and time; making the photo darker would also allow to add a little bit more contrast to it. --Aristeas (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Now that's what I call street photography! Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support, but is that a dust spot around the middle of the top margin? It looks like it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:A Balinese girl posing in a flower field.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 11:03:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Well done! I like the girl's expression and the overall simplicity of the scene. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support So cute -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Geez, it's hard to scroll away from this image. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per Frank. --Aristeas (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Suggest pulling up a little more shadow detail under the hat but still an exceptional image. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fiori di Como by Dale Chihuly at the Bellagio Hotel & Casino. in Las Vegas 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 16:08:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Glass ceilings and skylights
Info all by Pierre André Leclercq . -- Pierre André ^(talk) 16:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose It's unclear what's on the bottom left; either way, even if I do find out, it's way too dark. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your advice, best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 14:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gloripallium pallium (Royal Cloak Scallop), shell[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2022 at 06:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Pectinidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Great! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--XRay 💬 16:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Drow male (talk) 22:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Iolanthe piano transcriptions by Ernst Perabo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 21:52:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera
Info created by George H. Walker & Co., restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info Not much that can be done about text angle, as the higher text points down slightly and the lower up slightly. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Memorial to the victims of Communism, Prague 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 13:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support good contrast -- Wolf im Wald 03:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Gallery link improved. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose This is a decent photo but the shadow, mainly on the shoulder at right, and the burnt areas are disturbing. --Cayambe (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose Sadly I have to agree with Cayambe. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Works like an environmental portrait: the photo emphasizes the frontmost statue, but still hints to the complete monument in the background. With this subject high contrast is OK for me, the shadows add some drama to the statue’s face and I can still see many details in the shadows. --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Agree, light is not so good. --Mile (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per others. Good idea but light is just too harsh. Could be much better with an overcast sky, or backlight. --Kreuz schnabel 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Love the spider. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img76 StOlaf Church.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 12:45:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Estonia
Info St. Olaf's Church, Tallinn at evening Blue hour, all by me --A.Savin 12:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Lovely image until you look at the upper steeple. Also noisy at the sides, with what seems to be a little distortion. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Daniel's remark on the steeple. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose per Daniel. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nice blue hour atmosphere. At the first glance I thought that the steeple was heavily distorted. But when I compare some undistorted photos of the steeple, e.g. this one, it becomes clear that this steeple is actually extremely slim and hight, so this view adds only little (and, from this point of view, unavoidable) distortion. For me this is OK. --Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Puesto de frutos en el Zoco -- 2014 -- Marrakech, Marruecos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 11:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info created & uploaded by Alurín - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment I was going to comment on the size, but looking in the file history I see it was downsized. The larger version looks like it's probably salvageable, though? Might need a slight horizontal correction, too. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per the guidelines: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality." Only 2,100 × 1,391 pixels: too small. The original is larger but "blurry", as written by the uploader. See file history -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose resolution too low -- Wolf im Wald 03:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Basile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Apart from the technical issues, I just find this too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 06:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Golubac Fortress (град Голубац).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 10:27:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia
Info Golubac Fortress by Danube river. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I like the compact view and the light. But I'm not happy about the detail level. There are blurry areas and sharp areas all over the picture. I think several single images of the stitching are not sharp. Plants are a big problem because they move in the wind. Maybe this can be improved with some modifications in the stitching software (masking). The same applies to the wind turbine on the left. I marked some critical areas in the image notes. -- Wolf im Wald 05:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I like the image overall (I might have cropped some of the bottom out) but per Wolf something went way wrong in the processing. The castle walls and nearby vegetation look ... well, oversharpened is a starting point but I'd say it's more like unnatural. Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Nothing is wrong with processing, Hi-res dont work as one shot, so it take some time, due to strong wind here is the result. Flags were edited from other single shot photo. Concetrate on the Castle. --Mile (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)--Mile (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose sorry – overall this is a nice photo, of course, but when I view it in full size the castle walls, plants etc. look extremely oversharpened and completely articificial. Could you just reduce the sharpening? IMHO this would make it look much more natural. --Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Maybe single shot would work. --Mile (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Luz Station, Sao Paulo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2022 at 01:35:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 01:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I like the slice of life, including the guy with the Santa hat and shorts in a tropical zone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Yes, it’s nice, but I can’t see much special here. Just an ordinary scene in a railway station to me in harsh light, and 11 megapixels is not an extremely high resolution either. Red channel looks oversaturated (all the red clothes of the people on the opposite platform). --Kreuzschnabel 08:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Its not a "harsh light" just a cloudy day, however, the interior of the station is quite dark compared to the exterior and it is normal that the exterior has to be exposed a little. I could have done an HDR with a tripod to mitigate this situation, it's the only solution I can think of
- "11 megapixels is not an extremely high resolution either". There is a difference between the resolution and the size of the image as well, 11.3 although it is not a high resolution the image conserves more than 300 pixels per inch, finally I don't think it's necessary to see the skin pores here. This is an Aps-c and I had to crop the image to get a better frame
- "Red channel looks oversaturated", its not and you can use the red train how reference searching it on google, in brazil people dress more colorful
- "I can’t see much special here, Just an ordinary scene in a railway station, s not an extremely high", It is a non-technical and personal opinion full of exaggerated adjectives, it is your opinion and I respect it. From my point of view this is a live photo and should not be evaluated with the same standards of a static object and full frame cameras, additionally there is the factor of developing country which should also be taken into consideration.

Thanks for your feedback --Wilfredor (talk) 12:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Yes, there is nothing on a pure aesthetic level that makes this an FP, for me ... no visual pattern, no leading lines, whatever. But it is nominated as street photography and on that basis it succeeds overwhelmingly. This is a train station in one of the largest cities in the country in question during a major holiday travel period—of course it would be busy, and that is what this image is showing us ... so many people, so many separate stories. I particularly like the women just a little bit down the platform, clearly posing for a picture to be taken by another woman we can barely see. What are they doing? Are they off somewhere, or at the end of a visit?
I also like that the roof, from what we can see of it, looks almost exactly like the roof of Milan's Centrale station, which so struck me upon my arrival in that city for Wikimania 2016 that I had to stop and photograph it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Not perfect, but something new, at least... --Yann (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Robert Jacob Hamerton - Poster for A Sensation Novel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2022 at 23:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera
Info created by Robert Jacob Hamerton - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tumba de Ramsés I, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 103.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2022 at 19:53:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Frescos_and_murals
Info Painting in the tomb of Ramesses I, Valley of the Kings, Luxor, Egypt. The scene belongs to the Book of Gates and shows the pharaoh with Horus on the left and Anubis, Protector of the Dead, on the right. Ramesses I tomb (KV16) is rather truncated as Ramesses I ruled for less than two years during the Nineteenth Dynasty, being only 29 metres (95 ft) long. It consists of two descending staircases, linking a sloping corridor and leading to the burial chamber where this scene is painted. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support A little noisy, but I think you may have been in a difficult situation when taking this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You can imagine, no tripods allowed there, poor lighting, lots of people,...I'm offering almost 30 MPx of detail here and I find specially these paintings are among the best conserved. I cannot believed we have something of higher quality in the project. Poco a poco (talk) 08:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support given the very difficult circumstances and the high resolution. --Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question Why do FF-ers so afarid to put some ISO 1000, 1250 or 1600 ?! I bet it would be sharper with not much added noise. --Mile (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sunrise in Shkorpilovtsi, Bulgaria 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2022 at 11:53:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Bulgaria (non-existing section yet)
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Could be a bit sharper considering it wasn't dark enough to require a very long shutter, but still the mood is nice. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I might be biased by having been there and loving the place, but well - for me this shot captures all I love about the place. However I think bridges is not the right section. This is not exactly a bridge, but a pier. How about putting it into places/natural? --Kritzolina (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not so different than any other sunset. Very similar to the previous nomination. Ordinary architecture and not a spectacular sky, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose largely per Basile. Again, I'd love to see another Bulgarian FP, but this just looks like too many other piers at crepuscular times of day. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very nice for me. --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Looks like any other pier at sunset to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support I understand the objections, but the photo still makes me stop scrolling the page. Somehow I like exactly the contrast between the simple shapes of the pier and the colour gradients of sky and sea. Yes, it’s not the most spectacular beach, pier or sunset, but I still like the mood … --Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 153.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2022 at 20:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info Temple of Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egypt. The temple, also called Small Temple of Abu Simbel, was built about 100 m (330 ft) northeast of the temple of Ramesses II and was dedicated to the goddess Hathor and Ramesses II's chief consort, Nefertari. This was in fact the second time in ancient Egyptian history that a temple was dedicated to a queen. The first time, Akhenaten dedicated a temple to his great royal wife, Nefertiti. The rock-cut facade is decorated with two groups of colossi that are separated by the large gateway. The statues, slightly more than 10 m (33 ft) high, are of the king and his queen. On either side of the portal are two statues of the king, wearing the white crown of Upper Egypt (south colossus) and the double crown (north colossus); these are flanked by statues of the queen. Remarkably, this is one of very few instances in Egyptian art where the statues of the king and his consort have equal size. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Impressive to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Neutral~~ very tight crop IMO -- Wolf im Wald 01:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support now okay for me Wolf im Wald 21:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment Sky looks quite underexposed, maybe due to harsh light towards the temple. Could be possible to fix? —kallerna (talk) 08:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will look into that this evening (will try to gain some more crop and the sky exposure) Poco a poco (talk) 10:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

—kallerna: I've increased the luminance of the sky a bit without really feeling comfortable with the edit (premiere), I hope you like it better now. I also offer a bit more of crop now, Wolf im Wald Poco a poco (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It looks improved to me. What are you uncomfortable with? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ikan Kekek: Well, changing the luminosity of a part of the picture is something I haven't done before, it doesn't really feel right. I had this kind of discussion with the skies in the Atacama desert, they were also darker Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So increase the darkness, but what I liked was that you eliminated the color noise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

if it helps, I find it normal to have very dark sky in "high azimutal" parts of the sky. Also, given the latitude and the intense light, there's probably a strong contrast between the temple and the sky. Another reason for the latter rendering dark. But these are just personal observations. - Benh (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Composition is kind of stock, but color, detail and light make up for it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Larus michahellis juvenile with mask.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2022 at 06:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Larus
Info created by Biso - uploaded by Biso - nominated by Biso -- Biser Todorov (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Biser Todorov (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose low quality. Tomer T (talk) 11:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Gallery link improved (to allow to learn by example). Your friendly gallery link service ;–), --Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nice capture, but per Tomer T, not great quality such that it would be one of the greatest photos on the site, which is what featured pictures are supposed to be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The artificial vignetting is too much -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Poor quality, hopelessly oversharpened. --Kreuz schnabel 12:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose low quality. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Regretful oppose, love the idea of animals taking COVID precautions , love that it's from Bulgaria, but the waves are too distracting a background here even without going into the quality issues. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Barite - Cerro Warihuyn, Miraflores, Huamalies, Huanuco, Peru.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2022 at 08:52:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info all by Ivar (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ----Biser Todorov (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support, and a request: could you make clear in your file description or with arrows what the primarily clear crystals are, as opposed to the sort of rose-colored ones? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 21:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral The shadow bothers me. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cigogne blanche Ichkeul NP.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2022 at 12:15:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info White Stork (Cicogna cicogna) at Ichkeul national park created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I don't know ... WB looks a little off, and frankly it doesn't (ahem) stand out from our many other pictures of birds. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I quite like the contrast. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose Dull light and low level of details -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Isojärvi Isojärven kansallispuisto 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2022 at 09:48:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Finland
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by me. Aerial view of Lake Isojärvi at Isojärvi National Park during a humid summer afternoon. I like the light and shadows with the cloudy sky - and a glimpse of the blue sky mirrored from the lake. —kallerna (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support —kallerna (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Finland, or at least what I imagine it to look like because I've never been there, in one shot. I like that there's that one solitary boater in the narrows in the lower lake. I hope they're enjoying this natural experience as much as I imagine them to be, as I might in their position. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Good image, definitely QI; but not enought wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per above, the bluish tint on the distant view prevent the image to be very special. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:40, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tiled roof of San Nicolò l'Arena1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2022 at 04:57:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Other
Info: just as you thought you'd seen the last of the tiled roof... This version has less dominating shadows compared to the previous nomination. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nothing special here. There are not significative change with the first version. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 05:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Peulle (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The shadows have been lifted in post-process, but the light is still harsh from the original shot. That's not golden hour, or an exceptional moment of the day. Also per the consensus which emerged from the previous nomination: nothing special, in my view. -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support As I did the previous nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but what's so unusually remarkable about these rather ordinarly-looking tiles? --SHB2000 (talk) 23:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per others. No wow on my side. Just an ordinary roof in ordinary light. --Kreuz schnabel 08:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Moral support as for the first version. (Personally I liked the first version even better – such simple subjects are fine with high contrast and deep shadows.) @The Cosmonaut: Please don’t despair. Such minimalist subjects/motifs are always a matter of taste, and while this one does not get a majority here, another one may work well. So please keep looking for (and uploading) such minimalist photos, some people really appreciate your work :–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your support, Aristeas, this is much appreciated! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Darß 2021 - Weststrand 4.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2022 at 04:17:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Info Western coast of the Darß with the Darß Forest in the Western Pomerania Lagoon Area National Park. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 04:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 04:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose feels like a bit ordinary view to be FP. Tomer T (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose The poor lighting and the ordinary beach unfortunately prevent me from supporting. It's a nice view, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The unappealing light prevents me from appreciating the landscape. The sky and the sand of the beach are not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Good Friday Procession.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2022 at 19:33:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Bellina 09 - uploaded by Bellina 09 - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support A moving photo I have on my list of favorites. Many thanks for the nomination, Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Interesting, good composition. --Yann (talk) 07:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Excellent use of small DoF for subject separation while still putting the subject nicely in context. Thank you very much, Kritzolina, for the nomination; this photo was one of my personal favourites from Wiki Loves Folklore 2022. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support One of those "shouldn't work but it does" images. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose Clothes are oversharpened IMO. Besides the picture has a low detail level on the skin/beard regarding the resolution of only 7MP. -- Wolf im Wald 21:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose per Wolf im Wald. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support It is true that this image has technical problems but the expression on the actor's face and the scene make me think that it deserves to be FP --Wilfredor (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus), Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas Thomas-Fuhrmann 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2022 at 08:33:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info created & uploaded by Snowmanstudios - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Their wings form elegant, dynamic curves; these curves would even work as as abstract composition. --Aristeas (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The image looks too chaotic IHMO. The bird in lower part is diplayed only parly (the head cannot be seen and so on). Are these birds fighting each other or is this preparation for sexual act? -- Karelj (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral Don't we have another FP of this species (common enough in captivity but not too hard to photograph in the wild, IIRC)? I know that's not a reason to oppose by itself but I seem to recall liking the other one more. While Aristeas has a point about the combined curve of the wings, it is not to me striking and dynamic enough to offset the issues Karelj points to. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Maanshen (talk) 23:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support John Samuel (talk) 08:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2022-07-24 Motorsport, IDM, 87. Internationales Schleizer Dreieckrennen 1DX 3075 by Stepro.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2022 at 22:44:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
Info motor sports, IDM, 87. Internationales Schleizer Dreieckrennen: Markus Reiterberger (GER); IDM Superbike 1000; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
Support -- Stepro (talk) 22:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Interesting, and a good capture, but it's hard to see the competitor's head, so I find the photo has a strange effect on me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I wanted present the unusual side of a motorcycle racing thru a corner, instead of the common pictures of the other side. Stepro (talk) 05:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see. And you did. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regretful weak oppose "I wanted [to] present the unusual side of a motorcycle racing thru a corner". And you did. However ... given that the rider's head is, as Ikan notes, nearly invisible as a result, it would have been better to have a less distracting background. I also think the image seems slightly overexposed ... yes, I know you can't be too choosy with shutter speeds when taking this sort of picture, but here if it were possible to go down to something a little shorter, or do something in post, that would have helped.
This is, make no mistake, deservedly a QI. But it doesn't make it as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral Daniel and Ikan make good points, but I can't really support unless I see the rider's head. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Contestations en cours[edit]